To increase, to analyze the website and to manage ultrasurf ads ease Security.NL makes use of cooki

To increase, to analyze the website and to manage ultrasurf ads ease Security.NL makes use of cookies. By continuing to use this website, or by clicking the accept button to give you permission to use cookies. Want to know more about cookies? Check out our cookie list.
Attackers have managed to place ads that visitors with malware infected, one of the largest IT blogs on the internet malicious ads but the editors say they are because they did not use Windows. Escapes According to the blog, the attackers managed to keep. The sales team through a "canny scam" fooling The number of affected visitors would be easy, although it does not mention any figures. "We should note, but rather ultrasurf the editors work on OS X or Linux." The malware has been removed, visitors also get the advice in the event of unsolicited popups on the file to find. "Qegasysguard.exe" "Be careful, install a virus and make sure your system is clean."
The way the blog the incident handling not win any beauty, said Graham Cluley of Sophos virus fighter. "I ultrasurf am disappointed that Gizmodo gives no information about the threat, or links to virus scanners that visitors help cleaning their computers. Instead, they make a smart-ass comment about how she did not notice the infection because they own a Mac or Linux use. This does not demonstrate good customer service or respect to a large part of their readers. "
Instead they make a wisecracking comment about how she did not notice the infection because they use a Mac or Linux itself. That does not demonstrate good customer service or respect to many of their readers. ultrasurf "I beg to differ! @ For an IT blog is a good thing to let people know that in practice the use of OSX / Mac or people So Linux is better than using $ window.
"Instead, they make a smart-ass comment about how she did not notice the infection because they use a Mac or Linux itself. Testifies that not good customer service or respect to many of their readers." "Not everyone is a security expert, ultrasurf or security minded. In this regard, the reaction of Cluley a bit short-sighted, even though the reaction ultrasurf of the blog may indeed better deal. Maybe Cluley editors better advice can send what they then the website to post. Thats what constructive than drafting a blog put down, and thus the customers actually helped, if the editors such information then places. ultrasurf
Instead they make a wisecracking comment Nothing clever. Cluley says, "a rather snotty remark". Meaning: "arrogant or condescending." Their excuse is rather weak and the least they can do is sincerely apologize and give decent ultrasurf information (like the guys from Apache for example)., They find themselves still uber-geeks. That they be zeikt is only normal, arrogant bunch of losers! By the way, how could Cluley now send advice - that's just it - all information is kept indoors.
Instead they make a wisecracking comment about how she did not notice the infection because they use a Mac or Linux itself. That does not demonstrate good customer ultrasurf service or respect to many of their readers. "I beg to differ! @ For an IT blog is a good thing to let people know that in practice the use of OSX / Mac or people So Linux is better than using $ window. Had they better a virus can not use then could have been detected before the possible placement of the negative ad on their website. I also use Windows but not a virus. Is not for yourself, or for others.
By Syzygy: How do they get it into their head to OSX and Linux use. Yes pecies. .. when customers use a crappy OS then you obviously do that too. It is not so important ultrasurf what people use as you have to check whether something ultrasurf might not be for some users. Harmful in any way An anti-virus product there can help.
Regardless of who what OS is running and it is therefore not noticed ... the people of Gizmodo eventually just remain responsible for their own site. So how condescending they do to others, they themselves are the incompetents who have failed to check their site. And thus they have brought their "customers" at risk.
You are not logged in and responding "Anonymous". This means that no Security.NL account information ultrasurf (email ultrasurf address and alias) save for this reaction. Your comment is not placed directly but first moderated. If you do not have an account you can here a direct accou